Dan Brown profile

May 14, 2009

kosmo - See all 353 of my articles
5 Comments

Dan Brown’s first foray into the world of entertainment was as a singer and songwriter. He released two CDs before turning his attention to writing – a very wise decision. His fourth novel made him a literary rock star. Perhaps you have heard of it – The Da Vinci Code.

There is some great news regarding Brown. His fifth novel, The Lost Symbol (formerly referred to as The Solomon Key) will hit shelves on September 15! Pre-orders are being taken on several sites, and I’ll be pre-ordering my own copy very soon. As is his nature, Brown is being secretive about much of the plot. It will feature cryptologist Robert Langdon and will be set in Washington, D.C. The jacket of The Da Vinci code holds clues to the plot.

Oh, yes. The other news. The movie Angels and Demons, based on the novel of the same name, will be in theaters on Friday. I doubt that it will come close to the success of Da Vinci Code, but spillover popularity should still turn it into a very successful film.

I’m a big fan of Brown’s work. Let’s do a mini-review of his previous novels.

Digital Fortress, 1998. Digital Fortress focuses very heavily on cryptography. A rebellious, genius programmer develops an uncrackable encryption algorithm and offers to auction it off to the highest bidder. This could be a huge problem for the United State government, which has just finished work on TRANSLTR, a computer capable of cracking any encryption algorithm known to man. It is imperative that the code not fall into the wrong hands. Unfortunately, the programmer dies – bringing into play the threat that his partner would publicly release the code if he should die. He is not the only person to die in a high stakes battle to control the code. Opinion: a reasonable understanding of computers makes the book more enjoyable, but it isn’t mandatory. There is a lot of action in the book that is unrelated to the technical issues.

Angels and Demons, 2000. Angels and Demons introduces us to world renowned cryptologist Robert Langdon. A dangerous weapon – a canister of anti-matter – is stolen from CERN and a scientist is murdered. The symbol of the mysterious Illuminati group – a group though to have died out long ago – is left branded on the chest of the victim. The head of the lab calls in Langdon to try to track down the missing canister. Langdon reaches the conclusion that the missing canister is connected to the election of a new pope. As Langdon races against the clock to find the canister, leading papal candidates begin turning up dead. Opinion: this is the prequel to Da Vinci Code, and is a pretty good book in its own right. It might come up a bit short of Da Vinci Code in some respects, but it does take readers on a nice tour of Rome.

Deception Point , 2001. Deception Point takes place in the arctic, where Rachel Sexton is sent to join a team that will analyze a meteorite. Evidence of life is contained with the meteorite – possible proof of extraterrestrial life. But Rachel soon realizes that things aren’t quite what they seem – and very soon, her life is in danger. Opinion: an interesting story with a good mix of science and politics.

The Da Vinci Code, 2003. Robert Langdon is once again awakened in the middle of the night to be informed of a grisly death, this time at the Louvre. A beautiful police cryptologist (Sophie) secretly informs Langdon that the police are not merely using him as a consultant in the case, but that he is the prime suspect. Langdon and Sophie make a tricky exit from the Louvre and elude the police. They combine forces in an attempt to solve the murder. As they put more pieces together, more complex puzzles appear. They eventually discover a truth that could rock Christianity to its core. Opinion: This is a great book, with clever ciphers and lots of twists and turns. It is, of course, a work of fiction. As a Catholic, I believe that the Catholic Church contributed to the success of the book and movie by attacking the book. Had they simply ignored the book – as they ignore many books that contain content related to the church – much of the furor could have been avoided.

The Lost Symbol

Da Vinci Code

Angels & Demons

Deception Point

Digital Fortress

Post to Twitter

Kosmo is the founder of The Casual Observer and writes on a variety of topics. Kosmo's favorite articles to write are the Fiction Friday original short stories. You can contact kosmo via email at kosmo@observingcasually.com

Like this site? Subscribe via RSS, Subscribe via Email, or Follow us on Twitter

Comments

5 Responses to “Dan Brown profile”

  1. Baker @ ManVsDebt
    May 14th, 2009 @ 9:43 am

    My wife really loves Dan Brown! Honestly, I’m not sure whether I would or not. He seems engaging enough, but I can’t really get into fiction literature. I read a ton, but it’s all non-fiction.

    It might do me good to take a break and read some of his work!

    Baker @ ManVsDebt’s last blog post..Interview With A Dave Ramsey Certified Counselor
    Total Comments by Baker @ ManVsDebt: 10

  2. kosmo
    May 14th, 2009 @ 10:37 am

    @ Baker – I read a mixture. My non-fiction is mostly baseball and true crime / forensics (supplemented by subscriptions to Popular Science and Archeology) while my fiction is mostly mystery/suspense.

    Brown’s books make you think a bit – his characters are typically pretty smart. Da Vinci Code is probably the best place to jump in for the newbie.

    Toss a paperback version (you can find one at ANY used book store) into your backpack and read it on the way to Australia.

  3. Peter
    May 15th, 2009 @ 4:02 am

    I liked Angels and Demons better then the Da Vinci Code.

    Not sure why they let Hanks do this movie after he totally sucked in the Da Vinci Code.

    Sad that these great books are being ruined and I am one that loves when books become movies but not in this way.
    Total Comments by Peter: 32

  4. kosmo
    May 15th, 2009 @ 7:59 am

    @ Peter – yeah, you’re not along in your opinion that Angels & Demons was better. I personally liked Da Vinci Code better, though.

    Yeah, Hanks wasn’t a great fit for the role. Not exactly sure who I’d pick. Any suggestions?

  5. Peter
    May 15th, 2009 @ 4:26 pm

    I would probably pick any normal looking person. He has had so much plastic surgery that he is no longer believable as a genuine character which this movie called for.
    Total Comments by Peter: 32

Leave a Reply

Set up a customized icon to appear next to your comments!

Is your comment not appearing? Don't worry - I'm not censoring you. Your comment just got caught in my spam filter. It will be viewable shortly (almost always within 24 hours, and much more quickly 90% of the time).





CommentLuv Enabled


Writers for The Casual Observer are freelance writers who work as independent contractors. Opinions expressed by the writers may not necessarily reflect the opinion of management.

Copyright for all content belongs to the writer identified in the byline. Copyright for any content not associated with a particular writer belongs to Kosmo. Copyright for comments belongs to the writer of the comment.

Content from The Casual Observer cannot be reused in any manner other than what is allowed under the fair use doctrine of US copyright law or the applicable copyright laws of your country.

© 2008-2010. All rights reserved.

Please email Kosmo at Kosmo@ObservingCasually.com with any questions you may have.

  • Visit Our Sponsor:
    Irrational Family

  • Category

  • Archives

  • Visit Our Sponsor:
    SWAG (Sassy, Wise, And Grown up)

  • Recent Posts


  • Visit Our Sponsor:
    Lazy Man and Money
  • Search by Writer


  • Advertise

  • Here are some neat things I use on the site. Check them out!

  • Ajax CommentLuv Enabled d83dbef34cd2653b1062a0f74c27d697
  • The Casual Observer is a division of Hyrax Publications